ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. - The Orange County Clerk of Courts needs to improve controls over their administration of guardianship program, an audit found.
An Orange County comptroller completed an audit of Orange County Clerk of Courts Tiffany Moore Russell’s office and its administration of the guardianship program. It covered the period between January 2015 and December 2016.
A report of the comptroller's finding said that the audit aimed to determine whether the Clerk complied with the requirements of Chapter 744, Florida Statutes.
The comptroller's findings included that:
- Numerous cases where inaccurate data was recorded in the system.
- The court was not consistently notified when professional guardians were not in compliance with statutory requirements.
- Non-professional guardians were appointed without meeting all statutory requirements.
- There are no procedures to document identified conflicts of interest.
- The clerks did not notify the court of unauthorized attorney and guardian fees.
- The clerks did not notify the court or follow-up with guardians regarding inventory discrepancies.
- Clerks have limited training and job requirements, which are not sufficient for duties performed.
- The clerks did not notify the court regarding accounting discrepancies or follow-up with guardians about noted deficiencies.
- The clerks did not request the required documentation for trust filings.
- The review and approval of reports were not always completed timely.
- The clerks did not timely notify the court of delinquent filings.
- The clerk did not have written procedures for the discharge process and the review of final documents.
- The clerks did not timely initiate the attorney appointment process for guardian advocate cases.
- The clerks did not notify the court when statutory requirements for initial and annual plans were not met.
The report then said that with these findings, the "Orange County Clerk of Courts needs to improve controls over their administration of guardianship program."
It added that after learning of the issues addressed, the Clerk reportedly made numerous changes to administration procedures but they have not been evaluated yet.
Later on Monday, March 1st, the Clerk's Office said that they are reviewing the comments made. They said of the recommendations set forth, they currently concur with two, partially concur with seven, and do not concur with four.
"While some findings and recommendations included in the document are well-intentioned, we strongly disagree with a number of them, primarily because they are outside the scope of the audit and reflect a misunderstanding of our office’s responsibilities under the law," said Clerk Russell. "But, let us be clear: When it comes to guardianship, all of us involved in the process are working toward a common goal – to protect the most vulnerable in our community. We want the system to work effectively and efficiently on their behalf."
They also said that the timing of the audit spanned two different operations managers, three Guardianship Judges in the Ninth Circuit, several changes in statutes by the legislature, and several process improvements made voluntarily by the Clerk to increase efficiency and effectiveness.
In addition, the Clerk's office determined nearly three years into the office that they could no longer invest time and resources to conduct the reviews. So, without 100 percent of the cases in the auditor's sample, they said that they were not able to fully concur with the audit findings.
"Although we’re bound by statutory responsibilities, the Clerk of Court’s office is committed to a culture of best practices and continuous process improvement," added Clerk Russell. "We welcome feedback and oversight – and we will work with all offices of government to help improve the guardianship system so that, together, we can better serve those in our care."
Tune in to FOX 35 Orlando for the latest Central Florida news.